From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kriston v. Peroulis

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Dec 6, 2011
Civil Action No. 09-cv-00909-MSK-MEH (D. Colo. Dec. 6, 2011)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 09-cv-00909-MSK-MEH

12-06-2011

ZACHARY KRISTON, Plaintiff, v. TONY PEROULIS, HARRY PEROULIS, and DARRYL ROSENBLATT, Defendants.


Honorable Marcia S. Krieger


ORDER DENYING LEAVE TO PROCEED ON APPEAL

PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1915 AND FED. R. APP. P. 24

Krieger, Judge

Plaintiff has submitted a Motion and Affidavit for Leave to Proceed on Appeal Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915 and Fed. R. App. P. 24. The court has examined the file and has determined that the motion must be denied. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), the court finds that this appeal is not taken in good faith because Plaintiff has not shown the existence of a reasoned, nonfrivolous argument on the law and facts in support of the issues raised on appeal. Accordingly, it is

ORDERED that the Motion and Affidavit for Leave to Proceed on Appeal Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915 and Fed. R. App. P. 24 is denied.

BY THE COURT:

Marcia S. Krieger

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Kriston v. Peroulis

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Dec 6, 2011
Civil Action No. 09-cv-00909-MSK-MEH (D. Colo. Dec. 6, 2011)
Case details for

Kriston v. Peroulis

Case Details

Full title:ZACHARY KRISTON, Plaintiff, v. TONY PEROULIS, HARRY PEROULIS, and DARRYL…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Date published: Dec 6, 2011

Citations

Civil Action No. 09-cv-00909-MSK-MEH (D. Colo. Dec. 6, 2011)