From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kristeel v. Kulka

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 25, 2006
31 A.D.3d 717 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)

Opinion

2005-01241.

July 25, 2006.

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for breach of contract, the defendants Kulka Construction Corp., Jack Kulka, and International Fidelity Insurance Company appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Burke, J.), dated January 12, 2005, as granted those branches of the plaintiffs motion which were for leave to enter judgment on the first, fourth, and fifth causes of action, upon their default in appearing or answering the complaint, and for a permanent stay of arbitration, and which denied their cross motion for summary judgment limiting the plaintiffs damages on the first, second, and third causes of action, for summary judgment dismissing the fourth cause of action as time-barred or to change venue of the fourth cause of action, for summary judgment dismissing the fifth cause of action, and for an award of costs and an attorney's fee.

Before: Crane, J.P., Spolzino, Fisher and Lunn, JJ.


Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

Contrary to the appellants' contention, the Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in granting the plaintiff leave to enter judgment on the first, fourth, and fifth causes of action upon the appellants ` default. The Supreme Court properly characterized the appellants' behavior in failing to timely file their answers without offering any excuse therefor as dilatory ( see Torres v Houses "R" Us, 182 AD2d 684; Trapani v Imlug Seven Corp., 140 AD2d 690, 691-692; cf. Lehrman v Lake Katonah Club, 295 AD2d 322).

The Supreme Court correctly denied the appellants' cross motion for summary judgment and for an award of costs and an attorney's fee because they are in default.


Summaries of

Kristeel v. Kulka

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 25, 2006
31 A.D.3d 717 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)
Case details for

Kristeel v. Kulka

Case Details

Full title:KRISTEEL CONSTRUCTION, INC., Respondent, v. KULKA CONSTRUCTION CORP. et…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jul 25, 2006

Citations

31 A.D.3d 717 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)
2006 N.Y. Slip Op. 5919
818 N.Y.S.2d 496