From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Krisko v. Marvel Entm't, LLC

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Jan 9, 2021
1:19-cv-9256-GHW (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 9, 2021)

Opinion

1:19-cv-9256-GHW

01-09-2021

ZOLTAN KRISKO, Plaintiff, v. MARVEL ENTERTAINMENT, LLC, WARNER CHAPPELL MUSIC, INC., THE WALT DISNEY CO. FOX CORP., BUENA VISTA TELEVISION, LLC, UMG RECORDINGS INC., AMAZON.COM, INC., APPLE, INC., RONALD AARON WASSERMAN, SHUKI LEVI, HAIM SABAN, Defendants.


ORDER

GREGORY H. WOODS, United St ates District Judge

By letter dated January 8, 2021, the parties have informed the Court that tins case has settled. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that this action be conditionally discontinued without prejudice and without costs; provided, however, that within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order, the parties may submit to the Court their own Stipulation of Settlement and Dismissal.Otherwise, within such time Plaintiff may apply by letter for restoration of the action to the active calendar of this Court in the event that the settlement is not consummated. Upon such application for reinstatement, the parties shall continue to be subject to the Court's jurisdiction, the Court shall promptly reinstate the action to its active docket, and the parties shall be directed to appear before the Court, without the necessity of additional process, on a date within ten (10) days of the application, to schedule remaining pretrial proceedings and/or dispositive motions, as appropriate. This Order shall be deemed a final discontinuance of the action with prejudice in the event that Plaintiff has not requested restoration of the case to the active calendar within such 30-day period.

As explained in Rule 4(D) of the Court's Individual Rules of Practice in Civil Cases, the Court will not retain jurisdiction to enforce confidential settlement agreements. If the parties wish that the Court retain jurisdiction to enforce the agreement, the parties must place the terms of their settlement agreement on the public record.

The Clerk of Court is further directed to terminate all pending motions, adjourn all remaining dates, and to close this case.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Krisko v. Marvel Entm't, LLC

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Jan 9, 2021
1:19-cv-9256-GHW (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 9, 2021)
Case details for

Krisko v. Marvel Entm't, LLC

Case Details

Full title:ZOLTAN KRISKO, Plaintiff, v. MARVEL ENTERTAINMENT, LLC, WARNER CHAPPELL…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Jan 9, 2021

Citations

1:19-cv-9256-GHW (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 9, 2021)