From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Krim v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 30, 1961
14 A.D.2d 818 (N.Y. App. Div. 1961)

Opinion

October 30, 1961


In a negligence action by an infant to recover damages for personal injuries sustained when he fell from a bicycle, allegedly as the result of an obstacle placed in a public highway by defendant Caristo Construction Corp., a general contractor then engaged in the erection of a public school building; and by the infant's father to recover damages for loss of services and medical expenses, the said defendant appeals from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, entered December 13, 1960, as is in favor of plaintiffs against it, after a jury trial. Judgment, insofar as appealed from, reversed on the facts, and new trial granted, with costs to abide the event. In our opinion, the jury's verdict in favor of the plaintiffs against said defendant and the jury's implicit finding that the negligence of such defendant caused the accident, are against the weight of the credible evidence. Nolan, P.J., Beldock, Ughetta, Kleinfeld and Brennan, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Krim v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 30, 1961
14 A.D.2d 818 (N.Y. App. Div. 1961)
Case details for

Krim v. City of New York

Case Details

Full title:GERALD KRIM et al., Respondents, v. CITY OF NEW YORK et al., Defendants…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 30, 1961

Citations

14 A.D.2d 818 (N.Y. App. Div. 1961)