From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kriley v. Goodrich

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Nov 1, 1923
207 App. Div. 886 (N.Y. App. Div. 1923)

Opinion

November, 1923.


Judgment reversed, with costs, on the law and facts, and complaint dismissed, with costs, on the ground that the plaintiff has mistaken his remedy. The plaintiff did not have title to, nor was he in possession of, the goods which were sold by the defendants while acting as directors of the corporation. The goods belonged to the corporation, and plaintiff cannot maintain an action for conversion thereof against defendants. Findings of fact reversed are stated in the order. All concur.


Summaries of

Kriley v. Goodrich

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Nov 1, 1923
207 App. Div. 886 (N.Y. App. Div. 1923)
Case details for

Kriley v. Goodrich

Case Details

Full title:FRED E. KRILEY, Respondent, v. HARRY E. GOODRICH and Another, Appellants

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Nov 1, 1923

Citations

207 App. Div. 886 (N.Y. App. Div. 1923)