Opinion
Case No. 2:08-CV-00965-LKK-GGH
10-17-2011
SAMUEL BRANDON KRESS, et al., Plaintiffs, v. PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP, Defendants.
MARKUN ZUSMAN & COMPTON LLP ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP William A. Baird - and - BARROWAY TOPAZ KESSLER MELTZER & CHECK, LLP Peter A. Muhic WYNNE LAW FIRM Edward J. Wynne LAW OFFICE OF STEVEN ELSTER Steven Elster Attorneys for Plaintiffs Norman C. Hile Julie A. Totten David A. Prahl Andrea L. Brown - and - Daniel J. Thomasch Attorneys for Defendant
Jeffrey K. Compton (SBN 142969)
William A. Baird (SBN 192675) MARKUN ZUSMAN & COMPTON LLP
Steven Elster (SBN 227545)
LAW OFFICE OF STEVEN ELSTER
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
SAMUEL BRANDON KRESS, et al.
DANIEL J. THOMASCH (Admitted Pro Hac Vice)
LAUREN J. ELLIOT (Admitted Pro Hac Vice)
GIBSON DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP
Attorneys for Defendant
PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP
Peter A. Muhic, PHV
Robert J. Gray PHV
BARROWAY TOPAZ KESSLER MELTZER
& CHECK, LLP
Edward Wynne (SBN165819)
WYNNE LAW FIRM
NORMAN C. HILE (SBN 57299)
JULIE A. TOTTEN (SBN166470)
DAVID A. PRAHL (SBN 233583)
ANDREA L. BROWN (SBN 237629)
ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE
LLP
JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER TO
CONTINUE HEARING DATE ON
DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO COMPEL
FURTHER DEPOSITION TESTIMONY
Pursuant to Local Rule 230(f), Plaintiffs Samuel Brandon Kress, Lac Anh Le, Jason Patterson, Lauren San Mateo, James Stekelberg, Jeffrey LaBerge, Willow Markham, Dana Blindbury, Jesse Kenny, Kelly C. Jones, Albert Liu, David Beadles, Daniel Gonzalez, and Antoine Powell (collectively, "Plaintiffs") and Defendant PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP ("Defendant" or "PwC") (together, "the parties"), by and through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate to a continuance of the hearing date on Defendant's Motion to Compel Further Deposition Testimony from Plaintiffs Kenny and Kress, Pursuant to Local Rule 251 ("Motion to Compel") to October 27, at 10:00 a.m.
WHEREAS, on September 29, 2011, Defendant filed its Motion to Compel, noticing a hearing date for October 20, 2011 at 10:00 a.m. (Docket No. 237).
WHEREAS, the parties have attempted in good faith to meet and confer regarding the dispute which is the subject of Defendant's Motion to Compel, and only recently concluded the meet-and-confer process.
WHEREAS, the parties need additional time to prepare and submit the required Joint Statement Re Discovery Disagreement that will set forth the parties' respective positions regarding the discovery dispute.
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between Plaintiffs and Defendant, by and through their respective undersigned counsel, that the hearing on Plaintiffs' Motion to Compel shall be continued to October 27, 2011 at 10:00 a.m.
MARKUN ZUSMAN & COMPTON LLP
ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP
William A. Baird
- and
BARROWAY TOPAZ KESSLER
MELTZER & CHECK, LLP
Peter A. Muhic
WYNNE LAW FIRM
Edward J. Wynne
LAW OFFICE OF STEVEN ELSTER
Steven Elster
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
Norman C. Hile
Julie A. Totten
David A. Prahl
Andrea L. Brown
- and
Daniel J. Thomasch
Attorneys for Defendant
IT IS SO ORDERED:
GREGORY G. HOLLOWS
U.S. Magistrate Judge