Krell v. C. R. Bard Inc.

Full title: AMY L. KRELL, ET AL. [AS IT RELATES TO PLAINTIFF DIANA MOSS], Plaintiff…

Court: United States District Court, N.D. New York

Date published: Jun 23, 2021

5:21-cv-00531-GTS-ML (N.D.N.Y. Jun. 23, 2021)

Opinion

5:21-cv-00531-GTS-ML 1:21-cv-00537-GTS-ML

06-23-2021

AMY L. KRELL, ET AL. [AS IT RELATES TO PLAINTIFF DIANA MOSS], Plaintiff, v. C.R. BARD INCORPORATED and BARD PERIPHERAL VASCULAR INCORPORATED, Defendants.

ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFFS Jonas P. Mann Baron & Budd, P.C Counsel for Plaintiff ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANTS Vivian M. Quinn, Esq. Nixon Peabody LLP Counsel for Defendants C. R. Bard, Inc., and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.

HON. GLENN T. SUDDABY, CHIEF U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE

ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFFS Jonas P. Mann Baron & Budd, P.C Counsel for Plaintiff

ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANTS Vivian M. Quinn, Esq. Nixon Peabody LLP Counsel for Defendants C. R. Bard, Inc., and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.

JOINT STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

HON. GLENN T. SUDDABY, CHIEF U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between the undersigned parties, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 41 (a)(1)(A)(ii), that the above-captioned case be dismissed with prejudice, with each party to bear its own costs.

IT IS SO ORDERED.