From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Krawic v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Jan 24, 1996
666 So. 2d 599 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)

Opinion

No. 95-4209.

January 24, 1996.

Appeal of order denying rule 3.800(a) motion from the Circuit Court for Broward County; Paul L. Backman, Judge.

Mark Krawic, Zephyrhills, pro se appellant.

No response required for appellee.


We affirm the trial court's summary denial of appellant's Motion to Correct Illegal Sentence pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). Such a motion does not contemplate resolution of a factual dispute, and any error must appear from the face of the record. State v. Callaway, 658 So.2d 983 (Fla. 1995). Thus, our affirmance is without prejudice to appellant's filing a timely and properly sworn motion pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850.

GUNTHER, C.J., and POLEN and KLEIN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Krawic v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Jan 24, 1996
666 So. 2d 599 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)
Case details for

Krawic v. State

Case Details

Full title:MARK KRAWIC, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Jan 24, 1996

Citations

666 So. 2d 599 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)

Citing Cases

Leander v. State

Even if we were to consider the motion for clarification as a motion to conect an illegal sentence, to the…