From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Krauss v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 15, 2012
Case No.: 1:11-cv-01102-LJO-SKO (E.D. Cal. Mar. 15, 2012)

Opinion

Case No.: 1:11-cv-01102-LJO-SKO

03-15-2012

JANET KRAUSS, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.


ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION OF TIME AND MODIFYING SCHEDULING ORDER


(Doc. 15)

On March 15, 2012, Defendant filed a stipulated request for an extension of time to file a responsive brief. (Doc. 15.) Defendant indicates that an extension is needed to allow the parties to discuss the possibility of settlement. The Court GRANTS the parties' request.

Accordingly, pursuant to the stipulation of the parties, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Defendant's responsive brief shall be filed on or before April 16, 2012; and

2. Plaintiff may file a reply brief on or before May 1, 2012.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Sheila K. Oberto

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Krauss v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 15, 2012
Case No.: 1:11-cv-01102-LJO-SKO (E.D. Cal. Mar. 15, 2012)
Case details for

Krauss v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:JANET KRAUSS, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Mar 15, 2012

Citations

Case No.: 1:11-cv-01102-LJO-SKO (E.D. Cal. Mar. 15, 2012)