Opinion
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
NOT FOR PUBLICATION. (See Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure Rule 36-3)
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California, John F. Walter, District Judge, Presiding.
Waltraud Krause, Los Angeles, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellant.
Waltraud Krause, Los Angeles, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellant.
Karen S. Darling, Esq., AGCA--Office of The California Attorney General (LA), Los Angeles, CA, for Defendant-Appellee.
Karen S. Darling, Esq., Attorney General (LA), Los Angeles, CA, for Defendant-Appellee.
Before WARDLAW, BERZON and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Waltraud Krause appeals pro se the district court's Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) dismissal for lack of subject matter jurisdiction of her 42 U.S. C.§ 1983 action against defendant,
Page 603.
Los Angeles Superior Court Judge Ernest M. Hiroshige.
The district court correctly dismissed Krause's action on the ground that under the Rooker-Feldman doctrine federal district courts lack authority to review state court judgments. District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. Feldman, 460 U.S. 462, 476, 103 S.Ct. 1303, 75 L.Ed.2d 206 (1983); Worldwide Church of God v. McNair, 805 F.2d 888, 892-93 (9th Cir.1986); Branson v. Nott, 62 F.3d 287, 291-92 (9th Cir.1995).
We grant Krause's request for judicial notice, and deny her motion to strike.