From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Krauel v. Inspec Int'l, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FORT MYERS DIVISION
Nov 2, 2018
Case No: 2:17-cv-314-FtM-38MRM (M.D. Fla. Nov. 2, 2018)

Opinion

Case No: 2:17-cv-314-FtM-38MRM

11-02-2018

ARLYS KRAUEL, Plaintiff, v. INSPEC INTERNATIONAL, INC., PRIMA BUILDING SYSTEMS, LLC and JOHN PRETE, Defendants.


ORDER

Disclaimer: Documents filed in CM/ECF may contain hyperlinks to other documents or websites. These hyperlinks are provided only for users' convenience. Users are cautioned that hyperlinked documents in CM/ECF are subject to PACER fees. By allowing hyperlinks to other websites, this Court does not endorse, recommend, approve, or guarantee any third parties or the services or products they provide on their websites. Likewise, the Court has no agreements with any of these third parties or their websites. The Court accepts no responsibility for the availability or functionality of any hyperlink. Thus, the fact that a hyperlink ceases to work or directs the user to some other site does not affect the opinion of the Court. --------

Before the Court is United States Magistrate Judge Mac R. McCoy's Report and Recommendation. (Doc. 47). Judge McCoy recommends that the parties' Joint Motion for Approval of Settlement Agreement and Dismissal with Prejudice (Doc. 45) be approved. The parties filed a Joint Notice of Non-Objection to the Report and Recommendation. (Doc. 48). For the following reasons, the Court accepts and adopts Judge McCoy's Report and Recommendation.

After conducting a careful and complete review of the findings and recommendations, a district judge may accept, reject, or modify the magistrate judge's report and recommendation. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); see also Williams v. Wainwright, 681 F.2d 732 (11th Cir. 1982). In the absence of specific objections, there is no requirement that a district judge review factual findings de novo, Garvey v. Vaughn, 993 F.2d 776, 779 n.9 (11th Cir. 1993), and the court may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings and recommendations, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). The district judge reviews legal conclusions de novo, even in the absence of an objection. See Cooper-Houston v. Southern Ry. Co., 37 F.3d 603, 604 (11th Cir. 1994).

After independently examining the file and on consideration of Judge McCoy's findings and recommendation, the Court accepts and adopts the Report and Recommendation.

Accordingly, it is now

ORDERED:

1. The Report and Recommendation (Doc. 47) is ACCEPTED and ADOPTED.

2. The parties' Joint Motion for Settlement Approval and Dismissal with Prejudice (Doc. 45) is GRANTED. The settlement agreement and release (Doc. 45-1 at 6-12) is approved as a fair and reasonable resolution of a bona fide dispute.

3. The action is DISMISSED with prejudice.

4. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to enter judgment accordingly, dismiss the case with prejudice, terminate all pending motions and deadlines, and close the file.

DONE and ORDERED in Fort Myers, Florida this 2nd day of November 2018.

/s/ _________

SHERI POLSTER CHAPPELL

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Copies: All Parties of Record


Summaries of

Krauel v. Inspec Int'l, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FORT MYERS DIVISION
Nov 2, 2018
Case No: 2:17-cv-314-FtM-38MRM (M.D. Fla. Nov. 2, 2018)
Case details for

Krauel v. Inspec Int'l, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:ARLYS KRAUEL, Plaintiff, v. INSPEC INTERNATIONAL, INC., PRIMA BUILDING…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FORT MYERS DIVISION

Date published: Nov 2, 2018

Citations

Case No: 2:17-cv-314-FtM-38MRM (M.D. Fla. Nov. 2, 2018)