From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kratter v. Catholic Health Initiatives Colorado

United States District Court, D. Colorado
Dec 22, 2009
Civil Action No. 08-cv-02709-REB-BNB (D. Colo. Dec. 22, 2009)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 08-cv-02709-REB-BNB.

December 22, 2009


ORDER


By a Stipulated Motion for Extension of Time to Make F.R.C.P. 26(a)(2) Disclosures [Doc. # 61], the parties reported difficulties in scheduling depositions. Consequently, I ordered them to confer in an attempt to schedule all remaining non-expert depositions at dates and times convenient to the witnesses and lawyers. Minute Order [Doc. # 63].

The extensions of time requested by the parties were impractical. I entered an Order [Doc. # 66] on December 16, 2009, extending pretrial deadlines to the latest dates possible in view of the trial date set by the district judge. My ruling on the extensions impacted the proposed deposition schedule, however, so I ordered the parties to confer further to attempt to agree to a revised deposition schedule taking into account the expert witness deadlines I had imposed. Id. I warned the parties that "[i]n the event the parties cannot agree, I will set the [deposition] schedule as necessary." Id. The parties agreed to some deposition dates but not to others.

The parties have agreed to the dates and locations of the following depositions: Filippo Kratter; Ann Hermenson; Mary Gage; Barbara Katopis; M. Breslin; Cathy Smith Dean; and Randall Viola. I have adopted and will enforce the agreement of the parties with respect to these depositions.

IT IS ORDERED that the following is the schedule for all remaining non-expert witness depositions to be taken in this case. This schedule may be modified by order of the court only. I will not enforce any agreement of counsel not approved by the court which is not in compliance with this schedule. I will not modify this schedule for the convenience of counsel or any party unless the modification is stipulated. I will not modify this schedule based upon a parties' failure to subpoena a non-party witness as may be necessary to comply with this schedule. I will not modify this schedule because two depositions are set on the same day and must be taken at distant locations; counsel must assure adequate assistance to meet this schedule even in the face of such conflicts. All depositions must be commenced and completed on the date ordered.

Date Deponent Location

12/22/2009 Filippo Kratter Denver, CO Ann Hermenson Denver, CO 1/11/2010 Tracey Shatto Pursuant to subpoena 1/12/2010 Thomas Hackett Vail, CO 1/13/2010 Mary Bryan Vail, CO 1/14/2010 Steadman Hawkins Clinic Vail, CO Catholic Health Initiatives Frisco, CO 1/15/2010 Sandy Williams Pursuant to subpoena 1/19/2010 Mary Gage Frisco, CO Barbara Katopis Frisco, CO 1/22/2010 M. Breslin Frisco, CO Cathy Smith Dean Frisco, CO 1/23/2010 Randall Viola Vail, CO


Summaries of

Kratter v. Catholic Health Initiatives Colorado

United States District Court, D. Colorado
Dec 22, 2009
Civil Action No. 08-cv-02709-REB-BNB (D. Colo. Dec. 22, 2009)
Case details for

Kratter v. Catholic Health Initiatives Colorado

Case Details

Full title:GIACOMO KRATTER, Plaintiff, v. CATHOLIC HEALTH INITIATIVES COLORADO, a…

Court:United States District Court, D. Colorado

Date published: Dec 22, 2009

Citations

Civil Action No. 08-cv-02709-REB-BNB (D. Colo. Dec. 22, 2009)