From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kratt v. Burns

United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Pensacola Division
Dec 16, 2008
Case No. 3:08cv464/RV/EMT (N.D. Fla. Dec. 16, 2008)

Opinion

Case No. 3:08cv464/RV/EMT.

December 16, 2008


ORDER


This cause is before the court upon Defendant Regions Bank's "Motion to Dismiss Amended Complaint" (Doc. 29) and memorandum in support (Doc. 30) and "Defendants Jeffrey Burns, Donald Rutland, Judith Rutland, The Rutland Company, and Rutland Resort Properties' Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's [sic] Amended Complaint with Incorporated Memorandum of Law" (Doc. 31). Before the court rules on these matters, Plaintiffs shall be required to respond to Defendants' motions.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED:

1. Plaintiffs shall respond to Defendants' motions to dismiss (Doc. 29, 31) within TWENTY (20) DAYS of the date of docketing of this order.

2. Failure to comply with this order may result in a recommendation that Defendants' motions be granted and that final judgment be entered in favor of all Defendants. See N.D. Fla. R. 7.1(C)(1).

DONE AND ORDERED.


Summaries of

Kratt v. Burns

United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Pensacola Division
Dec 16, 2008
Case No. 3:08cv464/RV/EMT (N.D. Fla. Dec. 16, 2008)
Case details for

Kratt v. Burns

Case Details

Full title:FRED KRATT, et al., Plaintiffs, v. JEFFREY BURNS, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Pensacola Division

Date published: Dec 16, 2008

Citations

Case No. 3:08cv464/RV/EMT (N.D. Fla. Dec. 16, 2008)