From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Krandle v. Refuah Health Ctr.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Jan 25, 2024
22-CV-4977 (KMK) (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 25, 2024)

Opinion

22-CV-4977 (KMK) 22-CV-5039 (KMK)

01-25-2024

REBECCA KRANDLE, individually, and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. REFUAH HEALTH CENTER, INC, Defendant. DAWN ESPOSITO, and PAOLA CORTAZAR, individually, and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. REFUAH HEALTH CENTER, INC, Defendant.


ORDER

KENNETH M. KARAS, DISTRICT JUDGE

In their motion to substitute briefing, the Parties and the United States debate whether maintaining the confidentiality of patient data is a “medical . . . or related function[]” for the purposes of 42 U.S.C. § 233. Without deciding, but assuming, that confidentiality is such a function, the Court would like the Parties and the United States to address whether that function includes protecting patient data from breaches by third parties, or whether it is limited to protecting against unauthorized disclosure by the deemed Public Health Service entity.

The Parties' and the United States' submissions shall be no longer than 10 pages and are due no later than February 9, 2024.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Krandle v. Refuah Health Ctr.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Jan 25, 2024
22-CV-4977 (KMK) (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 25, 2024)
Case details for

Krandle v. Refuah Health Ctr.

Case Details

Full title:REBECCA KRANDLE, individually, and on behalf of all others similarly…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Jan 25, 2024

Citations

22-CV-4977 (KMK) (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 25, 2024)