From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kramm v. Holloway

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 1, 1932
237 App. Div. 840 (N.Y. App. Div. 1932)

Opinion

December, 1932.


Order denying defendant Holloway's motion to vacate the stay in the order to show cause of December 9, 1931, reversed on the law and the facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion granted, with ten dollars costs. The stay was granted in violation of section 882 of the Civil Practice Act in that there was no notice given ( Stuhmer Company v. Korman, 235 App. Div. 856) and also in violation of section 819 of the Civil Practice Act. There is nothing herein that estops the appellant from raising the question at this time. Lazansky, P.J., Young, Carswell, Scudder and Tompkins, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Kramm v. Holloway

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 1, 1932
237 App. Div. 840 (N.Y. App. Div. 1932)
Case details for

Kramm v. Holloway

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM KRAMM, Respondent, v. HARRIET G. HOLLOWAY, Appellant, Impleaded…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 1, 1932

Citations

237 App. Div. 840 (N.Y. App. Div. 1932)

Citing Cases

Matter of Cantelli v. Town Bd. Oyster Bay

Under section 819 of the Civil Practice Act, however, a bond is mandatory for all provisional remedies and…