Opinion
May 15, 1989
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Queens County (Pitaro, J.).
Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.
The record before us raises triable questions of fact concerning whether the plaintiffs failed to comply with the notice provisions of the insurance policy issued by the defendant Interboro Mutual Indemnity Insurance Company and whether the plaintiffs' 14-month delay in giving notice of the accident was reasonable under the circumstances (see, Security Mut. Ins. Co. v Acker-Fitzsimons Corp., 31 N.Y.2d 436, 441; cf., Eveready Ins. Co. v Levine, 145 A.D.2d 526). Lawrence, J.P., Harwood, Balletta and Rosenblatt, JJ., concur.