From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kramer Frank, P.C. v. Wibbenmeyer

United States District Court, E.D. Missouri, Eastern Division
Mar 9, 2006
Case No. 4:05CV2395 RWS (E.D. Mo. Mar. 9, 2006)

Opinion

Case No. 4:05CV2395 RWS.

March 9, 2006


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER


On January 2, 2006, Defendants filed a Counterclaim against Plaintiff. On February 10, 2006, Plaintiff filed a motion to dismiss or for a more definite statement as to Defendants Counterclaim. On February 16, 2006, Defendants filed a motion for partial summary judgment. On March 2, 2006, I granted Plaintiff's motion for a more definite statement and ordered Defendants to submit a counterclaim in compliance with the Federal Rules within ten days of the date of that Order.

Plaintiff has now moved for an extension of time to respond to Defendants' motion for summary judgment. However, because I granted Plaintiff's motion for a more definite statement, there is no basis for Defendants' motion for summary judgment. As a result, I will deny Defendants' motion for summary judgment without prejudice, and I will deny Plaintiff's motion for an extension of time as moot.

Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants' motion for summary judgment [#9] is DENIED without prejudice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's motion for an extension of time [#12] is DENIED as moot.


Summaries of

Kramer Frank, P.C. v. Wibbenmeyer

United States District Court, E.D. Missouri, Eastern Division
Mar 9, 2006
Case No. 4:05CV2395 RWS (E.D. Mo. Mar. 9, 2006)
Case details for

Kramer Frank, P.C. v. Wibbenmeyer

Case Details

Full title:KRAMER FRANK, P.C., Plaintiff/Counterdefendant. v. KEVIN WIBBENMEYER, et…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Missouri, Eastern Division

Date published: Mar 9, 2006

Citations

Case No. 4:05CV2395 RWS (E.D. Mo. Mar. 9, 2006)