From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kraft v. Sinoway

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 20, 1992
186 A.D.2d 441 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)

Opinion

October 20, 1992

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Francis N. Pecora, J.).


While we agree with the IAS Court that the information sought would be useful in determining whether defendants' relationship was such as to make two or more of them liable for the age discrimination alleged by plaintiff (see, Ennist v Shepherd, 117 A.D.2d 580), the demand that such information be provided back to 1975 is burdensome, and we modify to limit disclosure to the two-year period prior to the accrual of the cause of action.

Concur — Sullivan, J.P., Wallach, Kupferman and Ross, JJ.


Summaries of

Kraft v. Sinoway

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 20, 1992
186 A.D.2d 441 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)
Case details for

Kraft v. Sinoway

Case Details

Full title:JULIAN KRAFT, Respondent, v. PHILIP SINOWAY et al., Appellants

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Oct 20, 1992

Citations

186 A.D.2d 441 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)
589 N.Y.S.2d 24