From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kraft v. Maile

Appellate Court of Connecticut
Dec 17, 1985
500 A.2d 1345 (Conn. App. Ct. 1985)

Opinion

(4097)

Argued November 7, 1985

Decision released December 17, 1985

Action to recover damages for personal injuries sustained as a result of an alleged assault and battery by the defendant, in count one, and for the defendant's negligence, in count two, brought to the Superior Court in the judicial district of Hartford-New Britain at Hartford and tried to the court, Shaughnessy, J.; judgment, in part, for the plaintiff, from which the defendant appealed to this court. No error.

The appellant filed a motion for reargument which was denied.

Joseph Maile, pro se, the appellant (defendant).

John K. Currie, for the appellee (plaintiff).


This appeal by the defendant attacks a judgment rendered by the trial court on the ground that the court found facts without evidence to support those fats. An appellate court may not retry facts and its duty upon review when such a claim is made is limited to a determination of whether the trial court's judgment was clearly erroneous in this respect. A careful review of the record and briefs in this appeal leads to the conclusion that the trial court was not in error.


Summaries of

Kraft v. Maile

Appellate Court of Connecticut
Dec 17, 1985
500 A.2d 1345 (Conn. App. Ct. 1985)
Case details for

Kraft v. Maile

Case Details

Full title:CARLTON KRAFT v. JOSEPH MAILE

Court:Appellate Court of Connecticut

Date published: Dec 17, 1985

Citations

500 A.2d 1345 (Conn. App. Ct. 1985)
500 A.2d 1345

Citing Cases

Kraft v. Maile

Decided March 26, 1986 The defendant's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 5…