From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Krach v. Holcomb

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA FORT WAYNE DIVISION
Nov 12, 2020
Cause No. 1:20-CV-313-HAB (N.D. Ind. Nov. 12, 2020)

Opinion

Cause No. 1:20-CV-313-HAB

11-12-2020

REGINA KRACH, Plaintiff, v. ERIC J. HOLCOMB, Defendant.


OPINION AND ORDER

This matter comes before the Court on Defendant's Motion to Strike or in the Alternative for More Definite Statement (ECF No. 11). In his Motion, Defendant argues that Plaintiff's initial pleading is "disorganized, argumentative, complex, vague, and confusing, making Defendant's responsibility to respond to the Complaint nearly impossible and an unduly burdensome task." (Id. at 1). As a result, Defendant asks the Court to force Plaintiff to replead.

"Although civil litigants who represent themselves ('pro se') benefit from various procedural protections not otherwise afforded to the attorney-represented litigant . . . pro se litigants are not entitled to a general dispensation from the rules of procedure." Downs v. Westphal, 78 F.3d 1252, 1257 (7th Cir. 1996) (quoting Jones v. Phipps, 39 F.3d 158, 163 (7th Cir. 1994)). While Plaintiff is passionate in her cause, that passion must be expressed within the confines of the applicable rules. Defendant is correct that Plaintiff's pleading fails to state a short and plain statement of the grounds for this Court's jurisdiction (Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a)(1)), fails to include a short and plain statement of the claim (Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a)(2)), fails to include simple, concise, and direct allegations (Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(d)(1)), and fails to include numbered paragraphs limited to a single set of circumstances (Fed. R. Civ. P. 10(b)). Accordingly, Defendant's motion under Rule 12(e) is GRANTED.

To assist Plaintiff in complying with the applicable rules, the Clerk is DIRECTED to send Plaintiff a Civil Complaint Form. The Court strongly encourages Plaintiff to complete this form, identifying as specifically as possible the executive action she is challenging. Whether Plaintiff elects to complete the Court-provided form or not, Plaintiff is ORDERED to file an amended pleading on or before December 11, 2020, that fully complies with the pleading rules imposed by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

SO ORDERED on November 12, 2020.

s/ Holly A. Brady

JUDGE HOLLY A. BRADY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT


Summaries of

Krach v. Holcomb

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA FORT WAYNE DIVISION
Nov 12, 2020
Cause No. 1:20-CV-313-HAB (N.D. Ind. Nov. 12, 2020)
Case details for

Krach v. Holcomb

Case Details

Full title:REGINA KRACH, Plaintiff, v. ERIC J. HOLCOMB, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA FORT WAYNE DIVISION

Date published: Nov 12, 2020

Citations

Cause No. 1:20-CV-313-HAB (N.D. Ind. Nov. 12, 2020)