From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

K.P. and N.P. v. Reed

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama
Mar 29, 1996
676 So. 2d 939 (Ala. Civ. App. 1996)

Opinion

2940122.

March 29, 1996.

Appeal from Montgomery Circuit Court (CV-88-514); William Gordon, Judge.

Charles A. Dauphin and Mary Margaret Bailey of Baxley, Dillard, Dauphin McKnight, Birmingham, for Appellant.

Thomas H. Keene and William H. Webster of Rushton, Stakely, Johnston Garrett, P.A., Montgomery, for Appellee.


AFTER REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT


A portion of this court's prior judgment has been reversed and the cause remanded by the Supreme Court of Alabama. Ex parte N.P., 676 So.2d 928 (Ala. 1996). In compliance with the Supreme Court's opinion, that portion of the judgment of the trial court denying N.P.'s motion for a new trial of the loss of consortium claim is hereby reversed and the cause remanded for further proceedings consistent with the Supreme Court's opinion.

REVERSED AND REMANDED WITH INSTRUCTIONS.

ROBERTSON, P.J., and THIGPEN, YATES, and CRAWLEY, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

K.P. and N.P. v. Reed

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama
Mar 29, 1996
676 So. 2d 939 (Ala. Civ. App. 1996)
Case details for

K.P. and N.P. v. Reed

Case Details

Full title:K.P. and N.P. v. Josiah F. REED, M.D

Court:Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Date published: Mar 29, 1996

Citations

676 So. 2d 939 (Ala. Civ. App. 1996)