From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kozinitsky v. Richman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 2, 1998
247 A.D.2d 366 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

Opinion

February 2, 1998

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (I. Aronin, J.).


Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The court properly dismissed the action as the plaintiff failed to comply with all the conditions of the November 27, 1995, order which conditionally restored this matter to the Trial Calendar. Since those conditions were not complied with, we find that the matter was properly dismissed under CPLR 3404.

The plaintiff's remaining contentions are academic.

Thompson, J. P., Sullivan, Joy and Florio, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Kozinitsky v. Richman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 2, 1998
247 A.D.2d 366 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
Case details for

Kozinitsky v. Richman

Case Details

Full title:IDA KOZINITSKY, Appellant, v. ELISE RICHMAN, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Feb 2, 1998

Citations

247 A.D.2d 366 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
667 N.Y.S.2d 944

Citing Cases

C.G. v. R.G.

As Husband failed to comply with the pre-conditions indicated in the Order, he cannot now attempt to utilize…