Kovalev v. Walmart Inc.

Full title: SERGEI KOVALEV Plaintiff, pro se v. WALMART INC, INC., et al. Defendants

Court: United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Oct 28, 2022

No. 22-1217 (E.D. Pa. Oct. 28, 2022)

Opinion

22-1217

10-28-2022

SERGEI KOVALEV Plaintiff, pro se v. WALMART INC, INC., et al. Defendants

NITZA I. QUINONES ALEJANDRO JUDGE, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

ORDER

NITZA I. QUINONES ALEJANDRO JUDGE, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

AND NOW, this 27^th day of October 2022, upon consideration of the motion to dismiss filed by Defendant Brosnan Risk Consultants, Ltd. (“Brosnan”), [ECF 10], Plaintiff's response in opposition, [ECF 26], and the allegations in the complaint, [ECF 1-4], it is hereby ORDERED, for the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, that:

(1) Brosnan's motion to dismiss is DENIED as to Count II (negligence); and

(2) Brosnan's motion to dismiss is GRANTED as to all other claims and demands. Accordingly, Counts I, III, IV, V, VI, VII, and VIII, and Plaintiff's demands for punitive damages and injunctive relief are DISMISSED.

BY THE COURT: