From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kouwenhoven v. Gifford

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Oct 24, 1911
96 N.E. 1122 (N.Y. 1911)

Opinion

Submitted October 4, 1911

Decided October 24, 1911

Charles J. Katzenstein and Gates Hamburger for appellants.

James C. Van Siclen and Edwin G. Wright for respondent.


Appeal dismissed, with costs, on the authority of Porter v. Int. Bridge Co. ( 163 N.Y. 79) and Guarantee Trust S.D. Co. v. P., R. N.E.R.R. Co. ( 160 N.Y. 1); no opinion.

Concur: CULLEN, Ch. J., HAIGHT, VANN, WERNER WILLARD BARTLETT, HISCOCK and CHASE, JJ.


Summaries of

Kouwenhoven v. Gifford

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Oct 24, 1911
96 N.E. 1122 (N.Y. 1911)
Case details for

Kouwenhoven v. Gifford

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM H. KOUWENHOVEN, Respondent, v . ELECTA GIFFORD et al., Appellants

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Oct 24, 1911

Citations

96 N.E. 1122 (N.Y. 1911)
96 N.E. 1122

Citing Cases

Terwilliger v. Browning, King Co.

Hence, we are of the opinion that the application for an order allowing an appeal must be made at the term at…