From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Koumoulis v. Miller

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 7, 2003
304 A.D.2d 531 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)

Opinion

2002-08307

Submitted March 5, 2003.

April 7, 2003.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Durante, J.), dated May 29, 2002, which granted the defendants' motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground that neither of the plaintiffs sustained a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102(d).

Robert K. Young, Bellmore, N.Y., for appellants.

Smetana, Schwartz McKeown, Melville, N.Y. (Ronald A. Schwartz of counsel), for respondents.

Before: ANITA R. FLORIO, J.P., SONDRA MILLER, SANDRA L. TOWNES, WILLIAM F. MASTRO, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.

We agree with the Supreme Court that the plaintiffs failed to come forward with sufficient admissible evidence to rebut the defendants' initial showing that neither of the plaintiffs sustained a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102(d) (see Amato v. Psaltakis, 279 A.D.2d 439). Thus, summary judgment was properly granted to the defendants, dismissing the complaint (see Licari v. Elliott, 57 N.Y.2d 230).

FLORIO, J.P., S. MILLER, TOWNES and MASTRO, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Koumoulis v. Miller

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 7, 2003
304 A.D.2d 531 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
Case details for

Koumoulis v. Miller

Case Details

Full title:ELENI KOUMOULIS, ET AL., appellants, v. MICHAEL MILLER, ET AL., respondents

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 7, 2003

Citations

304 A.D.2d 531 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
756 N.Y.S.2d 885