From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Koulajian v. Smith

Court of Appeals of New York.
May 2, 2013
988 N.E.2d 1285 (N.Y. 2013)

Opinion

2013-05-2

Arpi KOULAJIAN, Appellant, v. Tamara SMITH, et al., Respondents.

Law Office of Robert F. Danzi, Westbury (Robert F. Danzi of counsel), for appellant. DeSena & Sweeney, LLP, Bohemia (Shawn P. O'Shaughnessy of counsel), for respondents.


Law Office of Robert F. Danzi, Westbury (Robert F. Danzi of counsel), for appellant. DeSena & Sweeney, LLP, Bohemia (Shawn P. O'Shaughnessy of counsel), for respondents.

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order affirmed, with costs. The Appellate Division correctly held that defendants were entitled to summary judgment.

Chief Judge LIPPMAN and Judges GRAFFEO, READ, SMITH, PIGOTT and RIVERA concur.


Summaries of

Koulajian v. Smith

Court of Appeals of New York.
May 2, 2013
988 N.E.2d 1285 (N.Y. 2013)
Case details for

Koulajian v. Smith

Case Details

Full title:Arpi KOULAJIAN, Appellant, v. Tamara SMITH, et al., Respondents.

Court:Court of Appeals of New York.

Date published: May 2, 2013

Citations

988 N.E.2d 1285 (N.Y. 2013)
988 N.E.2d 1285
966 N.Y.S.2d 773
2013 N.Y. Slip Op. 3124