From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kostic v. Tex. A&M Univ. at Commerce

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
Mar 31, 2014
No. 3:10-cv-2265-M-BN (N.D. Tex. Mar. 31, 2014)

Opinion

No. 3:10-cv-2265-M-BN

03-31-2014

NENAD M. KOSTIC, Plaintiff, v. TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY AT COMMERCE, ET AL. Defendants.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION

OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

After making an independent review of the pleadings, files and records in this case, and the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge dated January 17, 2014, the Court finds that the Findings and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge are correct and they are accepted as the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the Court.

IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge are accepted.

__________________________

BARBARA M. G. LYNN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS


Summaries of

Kostic v. Tex. A&M Univ. at Commerce

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
Mar 31, 2014
No. 3:10-cv-2265-M-BN (N.D. Tex. Mar. 31, 2014)
Case details for

Kostic v. Tex. A&M Univ. at Commerce

Case Details

Full title:NENAD M. KOSTIC, Plaintiff, v. TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY AT COMMERCE, ET AL…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

Date published: Mar 31, 2014

Citations

No. 3:10-cv-2265-M-BN (N.D. Tex. Mar. 31, 2014)

Citing Cases

Clarke-Smith v. Bus. Partners in Healthcare, LLC

And, temporal proximity standing alone is insufficient to establish an issue of fact as to pretext after an…