Opinion
Cause number: 01-14-00515-CV
03-17-2015
NOTICE OF ORDER ON MOTION Type of motion: Amended Motion for Leave to File Supplemental Clerk's Record Party filing motion: Appellee, Metropolitan Transit Authority of Harris County Document to be filed: Supplemental Clerk's Record If motion to extend time:
Deadline to file document: __________Ordered that motion is:
Number of previous extensions granted: __________
Length of extension sought: __________
[ ] GrantedJudge's signature: /s/ Terry Jennings
If document is to be filed, document due:
[ ] The Clerk is instructed to file the document as of the date of this order
[ ] Absent extraordinary circumstances, the Court will not grant additional motions to extend time
[×] Denied
[ ] Dismissed (e.g., want of jurisdiction, moot)
On February 17, 2015, the county clerk hand-filed a supplemental clerk's record containing decipherable photographs, which, the county clerk has informed this Court, are in the condition in which the trial court viewed them. See Roventini v. Ocular Sciences , Inc ., 111 S.W.3d 719, 726 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist] 2003, no pet.) (reviewing trial court's ruling based upon materials before trial court at time of ruling).
[×] Acting individually [ ] Acting for the Court
Panel consists of __________ Date: March 17, 2015 November 7, 2008 Revision