From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Korte v. State

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jun 28, 2021
2:21-cv-0240 JAM DB PS (E.D. Cal. Jun. 28, 2021)

Opinion

2:21-cv-0240 JAM DB PS

06-28-2021

EUGENE KORTE, an individual d/b/a EFK Systems, Plaintiff, v. STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

JOHN A. MENDEZ, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

Plaintiff is proceeding pro se with the above-entitled action. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21).

On April 23, 2021, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within thirty days after service of the findings and recommendations. The thirty-day period has expired, and plaintiff has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge's analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed April 23, 2021 (ECF No. 3) are adopted in full;

2. Plaintiff's February 8, 2021 application to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. 2) is denied;

3. Plaintiff's February 8, 2021 complaint (ECF No. 1) is dismissed without leave to amend; and

4. This action is closed.


Summaries of

Korte v. State

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jun 28, 2021
2:21-cv-0240 JAM DB PS (E.D. Cal. Jun. 28, 2021)
Case details for

Korte v. State

Case Details

Full title:EUGENE KORTE, an individual d/b/a EFK Systems, Plaintiff, v. STATE OF…

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Jun 28, 2021

Citations

2:21-cv-0240 JAM DB PS (E.D. Cal. Jun. 28, 2021)