No opinion. Appeal from order of the same court dated July 20, 1973 dismissed. No appeal may be taken from an order denying reargument of a motion ( Kornstein v. New York Tel. Co., 26 A.D.2d 820; Creason v. Jaeger, 16 A.D.2d 838). Respondent is awarded one bill of $20 costs and disbursements to cover both appeals. The examinations shall proceed at the place indicated in the order dated April 11, 1973 upon a written notice of not less than 10 days. Hopkins, Acting P.J., Martuscello, Shapiro, Christ, and Brennan, JJ., concur.
The excuse proffered for failure to timely file the statement of readiness is unacceptable ( Marzian v. D'Oench, 28 A.D.2d 723; Bosco v. De Pitt's Mountain Lodge, 28 A.D.2d 717). Appeal from order dated January 30, 1967 dismissed. No appeal lies from an order denying reargument ( Blades v. Burger N Shake Drive Inn, 28 A.D.2d 556; De Fabio v. Nadler Rental Serv., 27 A.D.2d 931, Kornstein v. New York Tel. Co., 26 A.D.2d 820). Christ, Acting P.J., Brennan, Rabin, Benjamin and Munder, JJ., concur.
This being so, the motion is properly treated as one to reargue (10 Carmody-Wait 2d, New York Practice, §§ 70:42, 70:43). An order denying reargument is not appealable ( Kornstein v. New York Tel. Co., 26 A.D.2d 820; H M Heating Utilities v. Teplitz, 24 A.D.2d 468). Beldock, P.J., Brennan, Rabin, Hopkins and Benjamin, JJ., concur.
It bears emphasis to mention that it has not been shown that the Civil Court of the City of New York lacks jurisdiction over this matter (CAA, §§ 202, 204; see Continental Grain Co. v. Christie, 259 App. Div. 126; cf. Kulock v. Kiamesha Concord, 28 A.D.2d 660; Towers v. Long Is. Props., 67 Misc.2d 1062). Similarly, the papers fail to reveal whether a different inferior court could exercise jurisdiction ( Kornstein v. New York Tel. Co., 26 A.D.2d 820; cf. Judiciary Law, § 190, subd. 3; § 190-a). Restricting cases in the Supreme Court in this department to those properly brought there is an important factor in calendar administration ( Haas v. Scholl, 68 Misc.2d 197, 201).