From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Korman v. Pa. State Police Honsedale Barracks

United States District Court, Middle District of Pennsylvania
Feb 24, 2023
CIVIL 3:21-CV-01516 (M.D. Pa. Feb. 24, 2023)

Opinion

CIVIL 3:21-CV-01516

02-24-2023

ALLISON KORMAN, Plaintiff, v. PENNSYLVANIA STATE POLICE HONSEDALE BARRACKS, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

SUSAN E. SCHWAB, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

For the reasons set forth in the Memorandum Opinion filed concurrently with this Order, IT IS ORDERED that the defendants' motion (doc. 27) to dismiss the amended complaint is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. The claims against the Pennsylvania State Police Honesdale Barracks and the claims against Trooper Scochin in his official capacity are dismissed for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. The claims against Trooper Scochin in his individual capacity under the Fifth, Sixth, Eighth, and Ninth Amendment claims are also dismissed. The motion is otherwise denied.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Korman may filed a second amended complaint within 28 days of the date of this Order. If Korman does not file a second amended complaint, the case will go forward only as to her First Amendment retaliatory prosecution claim against Trooper Scochin in his individual capacity as well as the state law claims against Trooper Scochin.


Summaries of

Korman v. Pa. State Police Honsedale Barracks

United States District Court, Middle District of Pennsylvania
Feb 24, 2023
CIVIL 3:21-CV-01516 (M.D. Pa. Feb. 24, 2023)
Case details for

Korman v. Pa. State Police Honsedale Barracks

Case Details

Full title:ALLISON KORMAN, Plaintiff, v. PENNSYLVANIA STATE POLICE HONSEDALE…

Court:United States District Court, Middle District of Pennsylvania

Date published: Feb 24, 2023

Citations

CIVIL 3:21-CV-01516 (M.D. Pa. Feb. 24, 2023)