Opinion
1:21-cv-11419
08-13-2021
ROBERT L. KORDAN Plaintiff, v. BARBARA RIGG, et al., Defendants.
PATRICIA T. MORRIS MAGISTRATE JUDGE
OPINION AND ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND DISMISSING THE COMPLAINT
THOMAS L. LUDINGTON UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
This matter is before the Court pursuant to Magistrate Judge Patricia T. Morris's Report and Recommendation. ECF No. 7. On June 7, 2021, Plaintiff Robert L. Kordan filed a pro se complaint naming various hospital and funeral home employees as Defendants. ECF No. 1. While the details of the Compliant are difficult to parse, Plaintiff seems to allege a vast conspiracy wherein Defendants “took [his ailing] wife, lied [and] said she died[, ] gave [him] false documents[, ] and committed several U.S. code violations in order to hide the truth.” See ECF No. 1 at PageID.6. All pretrial matters were referred to Magistrate Judge Morris., ECF No. 4, Plaintiff was granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis, ECF No. 6.
On July 23, 2021, Magistrate Judge Morris issued a report recommending that the Complaint be dismissed sua sponte pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). ECF No. 7. Magistrate Judge Morris concluded that “none of th[e] statutes [cited by Plaintiff] provide this Court with jurisdiction” and, as a result, supplemental jurisdiction should not be exercised over Plaintiff's remaining state claims. Id. at PageID.34, 41.
Although the Report and Recommendation states that the parties could object to and seek review of the Recommendation within 14 days of service, no objections have been filed. The election not to file such objections releases the Court from its duty to independently review the record. Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985). The failure to file objections also waives any further right to appeal. Id.
Accordingly, it is ORDERED that Magistrate Judge Morris' Report and Recommendation, ECF No. 7, is ADOPTED.
It is further ORDERED that the Complaint, ECF No. 1, is DISMISSED.