From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Korb v. Haystings

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania, Erie Division
Sep 23, 2022
1:18-CV-00042-RAL (W.D. Pa. Sep. 23, 2022)

Opinion

1:18-CV-00042-RAL

09-23-2022

ALBERT B. KORB, Plaintiff, v. SGT. HAYSTINGS, Defendant,


ORDER ON DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

IN RE: ECF NO. 135

RICHARD A. LANZILLO, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

As explained in the Memorandum Opinion filed in this matter this day, the Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Defendant Sgt. Haystings (“Hastings”) is hereby GRANTED. The Clerk of this Court is hereby directed to enter JUDGMENT in FAVOR of Defendant Hastings and against Plaintiff Albert B Korb. Further, the Clerk is directed to mark this case CLOSED on the Court's docket.

The Plaintiff incorrectly spelled Defendant Hastings' name in the caption. The Com! will use the correct spelling as provided by the Defendant. See ECF No. 136, p. 1., n.l.

So Ordered.


Summaries of

Korb v. Haystings

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania, Erie Division
Sep 23, 2022
1:18-CV-00042-RAL (W.D. Pa. Sep. 23, 2022)
Case details for

Korb v. Haystings

Case Details

Full title:ALBERT B. KORB, Plaintiff, v. SGT. HAYSTINGS, Defendant,

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania, Erie Division

Date published: Sep 23, 2022

Citations

1:18-CV-00042-RAL (W.D. Pa. Sep. 23, 2022)