From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Korb v. Haystings

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania, Erie Division
Dec 20, 2021
1:18-CV-00042-RAL (W.D. Pa. Dec. 20, 2021)

Opinion

1:18-CV-00042-RAL

12-20-2021

ALBERT B. KORB, Plaintiff, v. SGT. HAYSTINGS, JOHN WETZEL, SRC DOC; AND MIKE CLARK, SUPERINTENDENT ALBION; Defendants,


ECF NO. 99

ORDER DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS

Richard A. Lanzillo United States Magistrate Judge

AND NOW, this 20th day of December, 2021, upon consideration of the Defendants' Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings and brief in support (ECF Nos. 99, 100), and the Plaintiff's Response in opposition thereto (ECF No. 111), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, for the reasons set forth in the Court's accompanying Memorandum Opinion, Defendants' motion is GRANTED. Accordingly, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(c), all claims asserted against the Defendants in their official capacities, all claims against Defendants Wetzel and Clark, and all claims against Defendant Hastings except Korb's claim based on an alleged physical assault are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.


Summaries of

Korb v. Haystings

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania, Erie Division
Dec 20, 2021
1:18-CV-00042-RAL (W.D. Pa. Dec. 20, 2021)
Case details for

Korb v. Haystings

Case Details

Full title:ALBERT B. KORB, Plaintiff, v. SGT. HAYSTINGS, JOHN WETZEL, SRC DOC; AND…

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania, Erie Division

Date published: Dec 20, 2021

Citations

1:18-CV-00042-RAL (W.D. Pa. Dec. 20, 2021)