From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

KOPPERMAN v. ZAR

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department
Feb 25, 1970
62 Misc. 2d 940 (N.Y. App. Term 1970)

Opinion

February 25, 1970

Appeal from the Civil Court of the City of New York, Queens County, LEONARD L. FINZ, J.

Bertram Herman for respondent-appellant.

Ponzan Goldblum ( Albert P. Thill of counsel), for Samuel Zar, appellant-respondent.

Fogarty Nielsen ( Douglas A. Boeckmann of counsel), for John J. Nieves, appellant-respondent.


While Special Term properly concluded that there are triable issues as to the negligence of the respective defendants, it was error to summarily determine that plaintiff passenger's freedom from contributory negligence had been established. The resolution of this issue must await a plenary trial since it necessarily involves facts which are peculiarly within the knowledge of the moving party ( Terranova v. Emil, 20 N.Y.2d 493; Crocker-Citizens Nat. Bank v. L.N. Mag. Distrs., 26 A.D.2d 667; Jensen v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co., 27 A.D.2d 934; Marine Midland Trust Co. of Northern N.Y. v. Macaluso, 30 A.D.2d 932).

The order should be unanimously modified by deleting the finding that plaintiff did not, by her own negligence, contribute to the happening of the accident; as so modified, order affirmed, without costs.

Concur — GROAT, P.J., RINALDI and CONE, JJ.

Order modified, etc.


Summaries of

KOPPERMAN v. ZAR

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department
Feb 25, 1970
62 Misc. 2d 940 (N.Y. App. Term 1970)
Case details for

KOPPERMAN v. ZAR

Case Details

Full title:PAULA KOPPERMAN, Respondent-Appellant, v. SAMUEL ZAR et al.…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department

Date published: Feb 25, 1970

Citations

62 Misc. 2d 940 (N.Y. App. Term 1970)
310 N.Y.S.2d 374

Citing Cases

Fitzgerald v. District No 6

Undeniably, there are circumstances in which a passenger may be contributorily negligent in a negligence…