Summary
In Koplin v. South Orange, 6 N.J. Mis. R. 489; 142 Atl. Rep. 235, the relator had obtained, on March 5th, 1927, a rule to show cause why a writ of mandamus should not issue commanding the building inspector and the Village of South Orange to issue her a building permit.
Summary of this case from Socony-Vacuum Oil Co. v. Township of Mount HollyOpinion
Argued October 25, 1928 —
Decided February 4, 1929.
On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose per curiam is printed in 6 N.J. Mis. R. 489.
For the appellant, Feit Feit.
For the respondent, Riker Riker.
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, CHIEF JUSTICE, PARKER, CAMPBELL, LLOYD, VAN BUSKIRK, McGLENNON, KAYS, HETFIELD, DEAR, JJ. 10.
For reversal — None.