From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Koplin v. Johnson & Johnson Servs., Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
Jun 25, 2012
CASE NO. CV12-02998-EDL (N.D. Tex. Jun. 25, 2012)

Opinion

CASE NO. CV12-02998-EDL

06-25-2012

JOAN KOPLIN and DONALD KOPLIN, Plaintiffs, v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON SERVICES, INC.; JOHNSON & JOHNSON, INC.; DEPUY ORTHOPAEDICS, INC.; THOMAS SCHMALZRIED, M.D.; PINNACLE WEST ORTHOPAEDICS, INC.; GOLDEN STATE ORTHOPAEDICS, INC.; and DOES ONE through ONE HUNDRED, Defendants.

ALEXANDER G. CALFO (SBN 152891) KELLEY S. OLAH (SBN 245180) GABRIELLE ANDERSON-THOMPSON (SBN 247039) YUKEVICH CALFO & CAVANAUGH Attorneys for Defendants JOHNSON & JOHNSON SERVICES, INC., JOHNSON & JOHNSON (erroneously sued as "Johnson & Johnson, Inc."), and DEPUY ORTHOPAEDICS, INC.


ALEXANDER G. CALFO (SBN 152891)

KELLEY S. OLAH (SBN 245180)

GABRIELLE ANDERSON-THOMPSON (SBN 247039)

YUKEVICH CALFO & CAVANAUGH

Attorneys for Defendants

JOHNSON & JOHNSON SERVICES, INC.,

JOHNSON & JOHNSON (erroneously sued as

"Johnson & Johnson, Inc."), and DEPUY

ORTHOPAEDICS, INC.

[PROPOSED] ORDER RE STIPULATION TO STAY PROCEEDINGS


JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

Upon consideration of the Stipulation to Stay Proceedings submitted by Plaintiffs JOAN KOPLIN and DONALD KOPLIN and Defendants DEPUY ORTHOPAEDICS, INC., JOHNSON & JOHNSON SERVICES, INC., and JOHNSON & JOHNSON (erroneously sued as "Johnson & Johnson, Inc.") (hereafter collectively "the Parties"); upon consideration of all documents, files, and pleadings in this action; and upon good cause shown, it is hereby ORDERED that:

1. The Parties' request for a stay of proceedings is GRANTED;
2. All proceedings in this action are hereby stayed, pending a decision by the Judicial
Panel on Multidistrict Litigation on whether this case should be transferred to In re DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. Pinnacle Hip Implant Products Liability Litigation, MDL Docket No. 2244.
3. All deadlines, including any deadlines relating to a potential remand motion and any outstanding responsive pleading, are extended until 30 days after the entry of a joint Case Management Order in the MDL addressing remand briefing.

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

_______________

Hon. RICHARD SEEBORG


Summaries of

Koplin v. Johnson & Johnson Servs., Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
Jun 25, 2012
CASE NO. CV12-02998-EDL (N.D. Tex. Jun. 25, 2012)
Case details for

Koplin v. Johnson & Johnson Servs., Inc.

Case Details

Full title:JOAN KOPLIN and DONALD KOPLIN, Plaintiffs, v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON SERVICES…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

Date published: Jun 25, 2012

Citations

CASE NO. CV12-02998-EDL (N.D. Tex. Jun. 25, 2012)