Kopko v. N.Y. Live Poultry Trucking Co.

Full title: ALEXANDER KOPKO, ADMINISTRATOR, ETC., RESPONDENT, v. NEW YORK LIVE POULTRY…

Court: Court of Errors and Appeals

Date published: Feb 1, 1926

131 A. 923 (N.J. 1926)

131 A. 923

Opinion

Submitted October 29, 1925 —

Decided February 1, 1926.

On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose per curiam is printed in 3 N.J. Mis. R. 498.

For the respondent, O'Brien Tartalsky.

For the appellant, Lazarus, Brenner Vickers.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, TRENCHARD, MINTURN, KALISCH, BLACK, CAMPBELL, LLOYD, WHITE, GARDNER, VAN BUSKIRK, McGLENNON, KAYS, HETFIELD, JJ. 13.

For reversal — None.