From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kopisar v. Paley

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department
Dec 24, 1926
128 Misc. 463 (N.Y. App. Term 1926)

Opinion

December 24, 1926.

Appeal from the Municipal Court, Borough of Manhattan, Fourth District.

Benjamin Kosseff, for the appellant.

Joseph G. Wiman, for the respondent.


As the proofs tending to show error in date fixed for trial are uncontradicted, order denying motion to open default reversed, motion granted and judgment vacated, with ten dollars costs to appellant to abide the event, and case set down for trial for December twenty-third.

While the record shows that defendant was entitled to have the cause transferred to the borough of Brooklyn, the order denying the motion to transfer the action, in the absence of an appeal from judgment or final order, is not appealable as an intermediate order (Mun. Ct. Code, § 155), and the appeal from that order is dismissed.

All concur; present, BIJUR, O'MALLEY and LEVY, JJ.


Summaries of

Kopisar v. Paley

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department
Dec 24, 1926
128 Misc. 463 (N.Y. App. Term 1926)
Case details for

Kopisar v. Paley

Case Details

Full title:JEANETTE KOPISAR, Doing Business as the YALE PRESS, Respondent, v. ALFRED…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department

Date published: Dec 24, 1926

Citations

128 Misc. 463 (N.Y. App. Term 1926)
219 N.Y.S. 82