From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Koontz v. Williams

United States District Court, D. Oregon
Nov 23, 2011
3:10-cv-6227-HU (D. Or. Nov. 23, 2011)

Opinion

3:10-cv-6227-HU.

November 23, 2011.


ORDER


Magistrate Judge Dennis J. Hubel issued a Findings and Recommendation (#34) on November 11, 2011, in which he recommends this Court deny Defendants' Motion (#30) for Extension of Time and to dismiss this proceeding for failure to comply with a court order and for lack of prosecution. The matter is now before this Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b).

Because no objections to the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation were timely filed, this Court is relieved of its obligation to review the record de novo. United States v. Reyna Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003)( en banc). See also United States v. Bernhardt, 840 F.2d 1441, 1444 (9th Cir. 1988). Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, the Court does not find any error.

CONCLUSION

The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Hubel's Findings and Recommendation (#34). Accordingly, the Court DENIES Defendants' Motion (#30) for Extension of Time and DISMISSES this matter.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Koontz v. Williams

United States District Court, D. Oregon
Nov 23, 2011
3:10-cv-6227-HU (D. Or. Nov. 23, 2011)
Case details for

Koontz v. Williams

Case Details

Full title:KOONTZ v. WILLIAMS

Court:United States District Court, D. Oregon

Date published: Nov 23, 2011

Citations

3:10-cv-6227-HU (D. Or. Nov. 23, 2011)