From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Koonce v. Shoemake

COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT TYLER, TEXAS
May 9, 2012
NO. 12-12-00115-CV (Tex. App. May. 9, 2012)

Opinion

NO. 12-12-00115-CV

05-09-2012

LARRYM. KOONCE, APPELLNT v. TOM SHOEMAKE, III APPELLEE


APPEAL FROM THE 7TH

JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT

SMITH COUNTY, TEXAS


MEMORANDUM OPINION

PER CURIAM

Appellant has filed a motion to dismiss this appeal. In his motion, Appellant states that the parties have reached an agreement in satisfaction of the judgment and no longer wish to pursue the appeal. Because Appellant has met the requirements of Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.1(a)(1), the motion is granted, and the appeal is dismissed.Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Griffith, J., and Hoyle, J.


Summaries of

Koonce v. Shoemake

COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT TYLER, TEXAS
May 9, 2012
NO. 12-12-00115-CV (Tex. App. May. 9, 2012)
Case details for

Koonce v. Shoemake

Case Details

Full title:LARRYM. KOONCE, APPELLNT v. TOM SHOEMAKE, III APPELLEE

Court:COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT TYLER, TEXAS

Date published: May 9, 2012

Citations

NO. 12-12-00115-CV (Tex. App. May. 9, 2012)