Opinion
No. 3D19-413
11-20-2019
David S. Magram, P.A., and David S. Magram (Hollywood), for appellant. Cosio Law Group, and Eduardo Cosio and Julie B. Glassman, Coral Gables, for appellee.
David S. Magram, P.A., and David S. Magram (Hollywood), for appellant.
Cosio Law Group, and Eduardo Cosio and Julie B. Glassman, Coral Gables, for appellee.
Before LINDSEY, HENDON and GORDO, JJ.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. Delgado v. Laundromax, Inc., 65 So. 3d 1087, 1090–91 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011) (affirming summary judgment for defendant because "the mere presence of water on the floor is not enough to establish constructive notice" and the record lacked evidence of the length of time for which the substance was on the floor); see also Lago v. Costco Wholesale Corp., 233 So. 3d 1248, 1251–52 (Fla. 3d DCA 2017) (holding that plaintiff failed to establish constructive notice where there were no "facts suggesting the liquid had been there for a long period of time"); Encarnacion v. Lifemark Hosps. of Fla., 211 So. 3d 275, 278 (Fla. 3d DCA 2017) (affirming summary judgment where "answers to interrogatories and depositions [did] not establish how long the substance had been on the floor").