From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kontopedes v. Runnels

United States District Court, E.D. California
Aug 16, 2007
No. CIV S-05-2474 FCD KJM P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 16, 2007)

Opinion

No. CIV S-05-2474 FCD KJM P.

August 16, 2007


ORDER


On June 29, 2007, defendants filed a motion to dismiss pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b). Plaintiff has not opposed the motion.

Local Rule 78-230(m) provides in part: "Failure of the responding party to file written opposition or to file a statement of no opposition may be deemed a waiver of any opposition to the granting of the motion. . . ." On April 24, 2007, plaintiff was advised of the requirements for filing an opposition to the motion and that failure to oppose such a motion may be deemed a waiver of opposition to the motion.

Local Rule 11-110 provides that failure to comply with the Local Rules "may be grounds for imposition of any and all sanctions authorized by statute or Rule or within the inherent power of the Court." In the order filed April 24, 2007, plaintiff was advised that failure to comply with the Local Rules may result in a recommendation that the action be dismissed.

Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, within thirty days of the date of this order, plaintiff shall file an opposition, if any he has, to the motion to dismiss or a statement of non-opposition. Failure to comply with this order will result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed pursuant Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b).


Summaries of

Kontopedes v. Runnels

United States District Court, E.D. California
Aug 16, 2007
No. CIV S-05-2474 FCD KJM P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 16, 2007)
Case details for

Kontopedes v. Runnels

Case Details

Full title:ANTONIO KONTOPEDES, Plaintiff, v. DAVID L. RUNNELS, Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Aug 16, 2007

Citations

No. CIV S-05-2474 FCD KJM P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 16, 2007)