From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Koniz v. Lee

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Jul 19, 2021
324 So. 3d 43 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2021)

Opinion

No. 1D21-1068

07-19-2021

Gary L. KONIZ, Petitioner, v. Laurel M. LEE, et al., Respondents.

Gary L. Koniz, pro se, Petitioner. No appearance for Respondents.


Gary L. Koniz, pro se, Petitioner.

No appearance for Respondents.

Per Curiam.

The petition for writ of mandamus is denied. See State ex rel. Lawler v. Knott , 129 Fla. 136, 176 So. 113, 118 (1937) ("Mandamus will never be granted against legislative officers as to legislative or discretionary functions.").

B.L. Thomas, Bilbrey, and Nordby, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Koniz v. Lee

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Jul 19, 2021
324 So. 3d 43 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2021)
Case details for

Koniz v. Lee

Case Details

Full title:Gary L. KONIZ, Petitioner, v. Laurel M. LEE, et al., Respondents.

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Date published: Jul 19, 2021

Citations

324 So. 3d 43 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2021)