Koniz v. Lee

Full title: Gary L. Koniz, Petitioner, v. Laurel M. Lee, et al., Respondents.

Court: Florida Court of Appeals, First District

Date published: Jul 19, 2021

No. 1D21-1068 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. Jul. 19, 2021)

Opinion

1D21-1068

07-19-2021

Gary L. Koniz, Petitioner, v. Laurel M. Lee, et al., Respondents.

Gary L. Koniz, pro se, Petitioner. No appearance for Respondents.

PER CURIAM.

Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331.

Petition for Writ of Mandamus-Original Jurisdiction.

Gary L. Koniz, pro se, Petitioner.

No appearance for Respondents.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of mandamus is denied. See State ex rel. Lawler v. Knott, 176 So. 113, 118 (Fla. 1937) ("Mandamus will never be granted against legislative officers as to legislative or discretionary functions.").

B.L. THOMAS, BILBREY, and NORDBY, JJ., concur.