From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Konigsberg v. Konigsberg

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department
May 26, 1959
18 Misc. 2d 455 (N.Y. App. Term 1959)

Opinion

May 26, 1959

Appeal from the City Court of the City of New York, Kings County, JOHN R. STARKEY, J.

Caverly Dimond Dwyer Lawler ( Abraham H. Jackness of counsel), for appellant.

No appearance for respondents.


The plaintiffs failed to present any valid reason or excuse for the delay of more than two years after joinder of issue in bringing the cause on for trial and failed to set forth any facts showing merit in their action. In the circumstances, it was an improvident exercise of discretion to deny defendant's motion to dismiss the action for lack of prosecution ( Gallagher v. Clafington, Inc., 7 A.D.2d 627; Brassner Mfg. Co. v. Consolidated Edison Co., 1 A.D.2d 840; Moebus v. Paul Tishman Co., 5 A.D.2d 786; Mancino v. City of New York, 1 A.D.2d 830; Fast v. Meenan Oil Co., 1 A.D.2d 889; Taylor v. Savoy Ballroom Corp., 3 A.D.2d 675; Topp v. Casco Prods. Corp., 8 A.D.2d 727).

The order should be unanimously reversed on the law, with $10 costs and the taxable disbursements to the defendant and motion to dismiss for lack of prosecution granted, without costs.

Concur — PETTE, HART and BROWN, JJ.

Order reversed, etc.


Summaries of

Konigsberg v. Konigsberg

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department
May 26, 1959
18 Misc. 2d 455 (N.Y. App. Term 1959)
Case details for

Konigsberg v. Konigsberg

Case Details

Full title:SUE KONIGSBERG et al., Respondents, v. YETTA KONIGSBERG, Appellant

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department

Date published: May 26, 1959

Citations

18 Misc. 2d 455 (N.Y. App. Term 1959)
193 N.Y.S.2d 485

Citing Cases

Geh v. Mezey

The plaintiff has failed to sustain his burden of excusing the delay. ( Friedlander v. Roxy Theatre, 204…