From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

KONE v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

United States District Court, D. Columbia
Feb 16, 2011
Civil Action No. 11-0054 (RJL) (D.D.C. Feb. 16, 2011)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 11-0054 (RJL).

February 16, 2011


MEMORANDUM OPINION


This matter is before the Court on defendant District of Columbia Public Schools' motion to dismiss on the ground that it is not a suable entity. As a component of the District of Columbia government, this defendant is non sui juris. See Hinson ex rel. N.H. v. Merrit Educ. Ctr., 521 F. Supp. 2d 22, 34 (D.D.C. 2007); Kundrat v. District of Columbia, 106 F. Supp. 2d 1, 5 (D.D.C. 2000); Kelly v. Morris, 400 A.2d 1045, 1047 (D.C. 1979). However, plaintiff is proceeding pro se and, therefore, the Court liberally construes her pleadings. See Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519, 520 (1972); Gray v. Poole, 275 F.3d 1113, 1115 (D.C. Cir. 2002). Plaintiff's complaint reasonably is construed as an employment discrimination action against her employer, the District of Columbia. The Court will deny defendant's motion and, sua sponte, will substitute the District of Columbia as the proper party defendant.

An Order accompanies this Memorandum Opinion.

DATE: 2/14/11


Summaries of

KONE v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

United States District Court, D. Columbia
Feb 16, 2011
Civil Action No. 11-0054 (RJL) (D.D.C. Feb. 16, 2011)
Case details for

KONE v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case Details

Full title:BARBARA JEAN KONE, Plaintiff, v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, D. Columbia

Date published: Feb 16, 2011

Citations

Civil Action No. 11-0054 (RJL) (D.D.C. Feb. 16, 2011)

Citing Cases

Jean-Pierre v. Fed. Bureau of Prisons

5 U.S.C. § 552(f)(1). If an improper party defendant is named, the court may dismiss the action against those…