From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Komarek v. Planning Bd. of Town of Middlesex

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Apr 27, 2018
160 A.D.3d 1445 (N.Y. App. Div. 2018)

Opinion

470 CA 17–01455

04-27-2018

In the Matter of Andrew R. KOMAREK, Petitioner–Appellant, v. PLANNING BOARD OF TOWN OF MIDDLESEX, Town Board of Middlesex and Town of Middlesex, Respondents–Respondents.

MORGENSTERN DEVOESICK PLLC, PITTSFORD (VIVEK J. THIAGARAJAN OF COUNSEL), FOR PETITIONER–APPELLANT. HANCOCK ESTABROOK, LLP, SYRACUSE (JANET D. CALLAHAN OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENTS–RESPONDENTS.


MORGENSTERN DEVOESICK PLLC, PITTSFORD (VIVEK J. THIAGARAJAN OF COUNSEL), FOR PETITIONER–APPELLANT.

HANCOCK ESTABROOK, LLP, SYRACUSE (JANET D. CALLAHAN OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENTS–RESPONDENTS.

PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., CARNI, NEMOYER, AND WINSLOW, JJ.

ORDER

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs for reasons stated in the decision at Supreme Court.


Summaries of

Komarek v. Planning Bd. of Town of Middlesex

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Apr 27, 2018
160 A.D.3d 1445 (N.Y. App. Div. 2018)
Case details for

Komarek v. Planning Bd. of Town of Middlesex

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of Andrew R. KOMAREK, Petitioner–Appellant, v. PLANNING…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.

Date published: Apr 27, 2018

Citations

160 A.D.3d 1445 (N.Y. App. Div. 2018)
72 N.Y.S.3d 872