Komarek v. Planning Bd. of Middlesex

Full title: IN THE MATTER OF ANDREW R. KOMAREK, PETITIONER-APPELLANT, v. PLANNING…

Court: SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

Date published: Apr 27, 2018

2018 N.Y. Slip Op. 2989 (N.Y. App. Div. 2018)

Opinion

470 CA 17-01455

04-27-2018

IN THE MATTER OF ANDREW R. KOMAREK, PETITIONER-APPELLANT, v. PLANNING BOARD OF TOWN OF MIDDLESEX, TOWN BOARD OF MIDDLESEX AND TOWN OF MIDDLESEX, RESPONDENTS-RESPONDENTS.

MORGENSTERN DEVOESICK PLLC, PITTSFORD (VIVEK J. THIAGARAJAN OF COUNSEL), FOR PETITIONER-APPELLANT. HANCOCK ESTABROOK, LLP, SYRACUSE (JANET D. CALLAHAN OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENTS-RESPONDENTS.

SMITH, J.P., CARNI, NEMOYER, AND WINSLOW, JJ.

PRESENT:

MORGENSTERN DEVOESICK PLLC, PITTSFORD (VIVEK J. THIAGARAJAN OF COUNSEL), FOR PETITIONER-APPELLANT.

HANCOCK ESTABROOK, LLP, SYRACUSE (JANET D. CALLAHAN OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENTS-RESPONDENTS.

Appeal from a judgment (denominated order and judgment) of the Supreme Court, Yates County (W. Patrick Falvey, A.J.), entered December 1, 2016 in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78. The judgment, among other things, denied the petition.

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs for reasons stated in the decision at Supreme Court.

Entered: April 27, 2018

Mark W. Bennett

Clerk of the Court