From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

KOLZ v. RAND

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Oct 1, 2002
298 A.D.2d 982 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)

Opinion

CA 01-02601

October 1, 2002.

Appeal from an order of Supreme Court, Ontario County (Henry, Jr., J.), entered January 8, 2001, which denied plaintiffs' motion for a new trial on the issue of damages for future pain and suffering.

MORAN KUFTA, P.C., ROCHESTER (MARK J. VALERIO OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS.

THE CAMBS LAW FIRM, LLP, CAMILLUS (PETER J. CAMBS, SR., OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

PRESENT: PIGOTT, JR., P.J., WISNER, SCUDDER, BURNS, AND GORSKI, JJ.


ORDER

It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal be and the same hereby is unanimously dismissed without costs ( see Smith v. Catholic Med. Ctr. of Brooklyn Queens, 155 A.D.2d 435; see also CPLR 5501 [a] [1], [2]).


Summaries of

KOLZ v. RAND

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Oct 1, 2002
298 A.D.2d 982 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
Case details for

KOLZ v. RAND

Case Details

Full title:TAMMY L. KOLZ AND COREY KOLZ, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. PHILIP S. RAND AND…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Oct 1, 2002

Citations

298 A.D.2d 982 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
748 N.Y.S.2d 307